HELCOM
HELCOM News portal
The Baltic Sea - an introduction
State of the Baltic Sea Environment
Indicators 2004
Indicators 2003
Indicators 2002
Water exchange and conditions in deep basins
Freshwater runoff
Hydrography and oxygen in deep sea basins
Riverine inputs to the Baltic Sea
Nitrogen emissions to the air
Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen
Variation of dissolved nutrients
Cholophyll concentrations from satellite remote-sensing
Phytoplankton biomass and succession
Heavy metal emissions to air
Atmospheric deposition of heavy metals to the Baltic Sea
Trace metals in Baltic Sea water
Cs-137 in Baltic Sea fish
Cs-137 in Baltic Sea sediments
Ecosystem Approach
The Baltic Sea of Surprises
Search HELCOM:
Helsinki Commission Environment Pollution Man and the Baltic HELCOM Atlas

Runoff to the Baltic Sea Regions and total runoff

Printable version
Bertil Håkansson,SMHI


Results and assessment

Relevance of the indicator for describing developments in the environment

Runoff is a quantitative background indicator on the freshwater discharge, carrying the nutrients from the drainage areas to the coast.

Runoff is an important parameter on the change of pressure on nutrient supply due to varying climate and climate change. Also change in land-use can influence runoff. To evaluate the change of pressure on nutrient supply to the Baltic region it is necessary to know the variability of runoff and normalise for this natural variability.

Assessment

The indicator shows the annual runoff from drainage areas but integrated over the Baltic sub-regions (Figure 1).

Runoff is governed by the precipitation - evaporation on land areas and is also influenced by air temperature. It is the sum of direct river and diffusive runoff. In all sub-regions a strong seasonal, annual and decadal variability can be distinguished. Especially wet and dry periods are characterising the runoff. The 1970s were a fairly dry period compared with the 1980s and the later part of the 1990s. Geographically, the runoff is of about the same size in the Gulf of Bothnia, Gulf of Finland and the Baltic Proper, whereas the Gulf of Riga and the Kattegat is contributes to a lesser extent to the total runoff.

There is no obvious trend in the annual runoff during the last 50 years (Figure 2), neither in the total nor from sub-regions. The dry period found during the 1970s could have masked the marine eutrophication since the runoff was lower than average and hence also the total load of nutrients. During the wet periods the total nutrient load (pressure) increased making marine eutrophication (effects) even worse.

figure 1 small.gif

Figure 1: Runoff to the Baltic subregions based on annual mean from 1950 to 2001.

figure 2.gif

Figure 2: Total runoff to the Baltic Sea based on annual mean from 1950 to 2001 (m3/s).

       ............................................................................................................

Data
Data from 1950 to 1998 is based on observations from national focal points, whereas the data from 1999 to 2002 is based on modelling by SMHI using the HBV-model for the Baltic Sea drainage area.

References
Bergström, S. And B. Carlsson 1994. River runoff to the Baltic Sea 1950 - 1990. Ambio Vol. 23, No. 4-5, 280 - 287.

Summary (<20 words) There is no obvious trend in the annual runoff during the last 50 years; neither in the total nor from sub-regions.